Leaderboard
Track performance rankings across agents, scorecards, and teams with comprehensive leaderboard analytics.

Overview
Section titled “Overview”The Leaderboard provides performance rankings based on quality metrics. Use it to:
- Identify top performers
- Spot coaching opportunities
- Compare team performance
- Track improvement over time
- Recognize achievement
Accessing the leaderboard
Section titled “Accessing the leaderboard”- Click Leaderboard in the main navigation.
- The default view shows agent rankings.
- Use tabs to switch between ranking modes.
Ranking modes
Section titled “Ranking modes”Agent rankings
Section titled “Agent rankings”Rank individual agents by performance metrics.
Columns displayed:
- Rank position
- Agent name
- Group assignment
- Quality metrics (see below)
- Trend indicator (improving/declining)
To view agent rankings:
- Select Agents tab.
- Apply filters as needed (date range, group, workspace).
- Sort by clicking column headers.
Scorecard rankings
Section titled “Scorecard rankings”Rank performance on specific scorecards.
This view shows:
- Scorecard name
- Average score across all evaluations
- Pass rate
- Number of evaluations
- Top and bottom performing agents on this scorecard
To view scorecard rankings:
- Select Scorecards tab.
- Choose which scorecard to analyze.
- See performance breakdown.
Group/team rankings
Section titled “Group/team rankings”Compare performance across teams.
This view shows:
- Group name
- Team size
- Aggregate metrics
- Best performing agents in each group
To view group rankings:
- Select Groups tab.
- Compare team performance side-by-side.
- Drill down into specific groups.
Key metrics
Section titled “Key metrics”Average Quality Score (AQS)
Section titled “Average Quality Score (AQS)”The mean quality score across all evaluations.
- Range: 0-100%
- Calculation: Sum of all scores ÷ number of evaluations
- Usage: Primary performance indicator
Higher AQS indicates better overall quality.
Pass Rate
Section titled “Pass Rate”Percentage of evaluations that meet the passing threshold.
- Range: 0-100%
- Calculation: Passing evaluations ÷ total evaluations × 100
- Usage: Measures consistency
High pass rates with high AQS indicate strong, consistent performance.
Coverage
Section titled “Coverage”Percentage of interactions that received evaluations.
- Range: 0-100%
- Calculation: Evaluated interactions ÷ total interactions × 100
- Usage: Measures evaluation completeness
Target coverage varies by organization, typically 10-20%.
Average Handle Time (AHT)
Section titled “Average Handle Time (AHT)”Average duration of interactions.
- Format: Minutes and seconds
- Usage: Efficiency metric
- Context: Compare against quality scores
Very low AHT with low quality may indicate rushing. Very high AHT may indicate inefficiency.
Sentiment metrics
Section titled “Sentiment metrics”Customer sentiment analysis:
- Average sentiment: Overall customer satisfaction
- Positive rate: Percentage of positive interactions
- Negative rate: Percentage of negative interactions
- Sentiment trend: Improving or declining over time
Sentiment complements quality scores to show customer perception.
Using filters
Section titled “Using filters”Date range
Section titled “Date range”Select the time period for rankings:
- Today
- Yesterday
- Last 7 days
- Last 30 days
- This month
- Last month
- Custom range
Rankings update based on interactions within the selected period.
Group filter
Section titled “Group filter”Narrow rankings to specific teams:
- Click the Group filter.
- Select one or more groups.
- Rankings refresh to show only selected groups.
Workspace filter
Section titled “Workspace filter”Filter by workspace:
- Click the Workspace filter.
- Select a workspace.
- See rankings for that scope.
Scorecard filter
Section titled “Scorecard filter”Rank by specific scorecard:
- Click the Scorecard filter.
- Select a scorecard.
- Rankings use that scorecard’s metrics.
Sorting and ranking
Section titled “Sorting and ranking”Default sorting
Section titled “Default sorting”By default, the leaderboard sorts by:
- Agents: Average Quality Score (descending)
- Scorecards: Average score (descending)
- Groups: Average Quality Score (descending)
Custom sorting
Section titled “Custom sorting”Click any column header to sort by that metric:
- First click: Sort descending (highest first)
- Second click: Sort ascending (lowest first)
- Third click: Return to default
When agents have identical scores:
- Higher pass rate ranks higher
- More evaluations ranks higher
- Alphabetically by name
Trends
Section titled “Trends”Trend indicators
Section titled “Trend indicators”Each agent shows a trend indicator:
- ↑ Green: Improving (score increased 5%+)
- → Gray: Stable (within 5%)
- ↓ Red: Declining (score decreased 5%+)
Trend compares current period to previous period of same length.
Viewing trend details
Section titled “Viewing trend details”Click an agent’s name to see:
- Historical performance chart
- Score progression over time
- Evaluation history
- Detailed metrics breakdown
Exporting leaderboard data
Section titled “Exporting leaderboard data”Export options
Section titled “Export options”Download leaderboard data:
- Configure your view (filters, rankings, date range).
- Click Export button.
- The data downloads as a CSV file compatible with Excel and other spreadsheet tools.
What’s included
Section titled “What’s included”Exports contain:
- All visible columns
- Current filter configuration
- Rankings data
- Metadata (export date, parameters)
Note: Scheduling is not available for the Leaderboard. To schedule automated reports, create a saved view in Explore and configure a schedule there.
Best practices
Section titled “Best practices”Using the leaderboard effectively
Section titled “Using the leaderboard effectively”- Compare fairly: Use filters to compare similar roles/time periods
- Look at trends: One-time rankings matter less than trends
- Consider context: High scores with low coverage may not represent true performance
- Balance metrics: Don’t focus only on AQS—consider pass rate and sentiment
- Celebrate success: Recognize top performers publicly
Coaching with the leaderboard
Section titled “Coaching with the leaderboard”- Identify agents in bottom quartile for coaching
- Compare top and bottom performers to identify best practices
- Track improvement after coaching interventions
- Use scorecard rankings to identify specific skill gaps
Group management
Section titled “Group management”- Compare groups to identify training needs
- Set group goals based on leaderboard benchmarks
- Use group rankings in team meetings
- Share best practices across groups